My objection to fascism is that -apart from Fascist Italy and Axis powers - no state has self-described as 'fascist', nor been described by outsiders as such except as a pejorative. The differences between applied Communist systems borderline on semantics, in contrast, socialism has included both the Nazis and activists such as Eugene Debbs in the same generation.
Comparing communism and socialism as comparatively broad concepts is absurd. Socialists can form political systems but socialism is not in and of itself a political system as it is based in economics and social ideals, socialists are not defined by a desire to end liberal democracy or give poor people greater voting rights however. Idk why you thought this could go unnoticed. The exact wording of the sentence is "unlike systems such as.plutocracy is not rooted in an established political philosophy." So yes, the entire point of the sentence in fact is to list political philosophies that go hand in hand with the named systems. Neither communism, nor socialism of course are 'monolithic' politically, economically, nor in terms of underlyimg philosophy, they are both 'broad concepts'. The sentence does not claim that socialism is a political philosophy- although the linked WP article DOES - it is certainly a political system and it certainly has attached political philosophical ideas. The sentence begins "Unlike systems such as … … ", therefore your most recent objection "also socialism is an economic system not a political philo(sophy) is especially silly. I did reference your objections, you just don't seem to be paying attention. WP:BRD the onus is on YOU to justify your changes not on me to defend the pre-existing text, but you simply edit war your own favoured version without reference to the objections. User:OgamD218, you recently (7th October) altered content - the changes have been challenged, by me.
0 kommentar(er)
